200. The believers are asked to fight those who hindered their efforts in the cause of God, and acted with hostility towards them merely because they sought to fashion human life according to the revealed guidance of God. Earlier, when they were weak and scattered, the Muslims were asked merely to preach and be patient with the wrongful repression meted out to them by their opponents. However, now that a small city state had been established in Madina they were commanded for the first time to unsheathe their swords against those who had resorted to armed hostility against their movement of reform. It was some time after this injunction that the Battle of Badr took place, to be followed by several other battles.
201. The believers are told that material interests should not be the motivation for their fighting, that they should not take up arms against those who were not in opposition to the true faith, that they should not resort to unscrupulous methods or to the indiscriminate killing and pillage which characterized the wars of the pre-Islamic era, the Age of Ignorance. The excesses alluded to in this verse are acts such as taking up arms against women and children, the old and the injured, mutilation of the dead bodies of the enemy, uncalled-for devastation through the destruction of fields and livestock, and other similar acts of injustice and brutality. In the Hadith all these acts have been prohibited. The real intent of the verse is to stress that force should be used only when its use is unavoidable, and only to the extent that is absolutely necessary.
202. Here the word fitnah is used in the sense of 'persecution'. It refers
to a situation whereby either a person or a group is subjected to harassment
and intimidation for having accepted, as true, a set of ideas contrary to those
currently held, and for striving to effect reforms in the existing order of
society by preaching what is good and condemning what is wrong. Such a situation
must be changed, if need be, by the force of arms.
Bloodshed is bad, but when one group of people imposes its ideology and forcibly
prevents others from accepting the truth, then it becomes guilty of an even
more serious crime. In such circumstances, it is perfectly legitimate to remove
that oppressive group by the force of arms.
203. God, in whom the believers have faith, is forgiving and ready to pardon even the worst criminals and sinners after they have renounced their arrogant defiance towards Him. It is suggested that this attribute of God should be reflected in the behaviour of the believers as well. As the saying goes: 'Mould your morals according to the attributes of God.' Hence, Whenever the believers have to resort to armed conflict, they should do so not for the sake of quenching their thirst for vengeance but in the cause of God's religion. Their conflict with any group should last only as long as that group resists the cause of God. As soon as it gives up this resistance hostility should cease.
204. Here the term fitnah is used in a different sense from the one in which
it was used above see( verse 191). It is evident from the context that fitnah
refers here to the state of affairs wherein the object of obedience is someone
other than God. Hence the purpose of a believer's fighting is that this fitnah
should cease and obedience should be consecrated to God alone.
An investigation of the usages of the word din (which occurs in this verse)
reveals that the core of its meaning is obedience. In its technical usage, the
word refers to that system of life which arises as a result of a person recognizing
someone as his Lord and Sovereign and committing himself to following his commands
and ordinances. This explanation of the word din makes it quite clear that when
some human beings establish their godhead and absolute dominance over others,
this state of affairs is one of fitnah. Islam seeks to put an end to this and
replace it by a state of affairs in which people live in obedience to the laws
of God alone.
205. What is meant here by 'desisting' is not the abandonment of unbelief
and polytheism on the part of the unbelievers but rather their desistance from
active hostility to the religion enjoined by God. The unbeliever, the polytheist,
the atheist, has each been, empowered to hold on to his beliefs and to
worship
who and whatever he wishes. In order to deliver these people from their error,
Muslims are required to counsel them and tell them where their good lies. But
Muslims ought not to try to achieve this purpose by resorting to force. At the
same time, these misguided people have no right to either enforce the false
laws of their own contriving instead of the laws of God or to drive the people
of God to bondage of others than God. In order to put an end to this fitnah,
both persuasion and force be used, whenever and to the extent to which each
of the two is needed, and a true believer will not rest until the unbelievers
give up this fitnah.
The statement that hostility is meant only against wrong-doers seems to imply
that when the true system of life replaces the false one, ordinary people should
be granted a general amnesty. At the same time, however, it would be justifiable
to punish those who exceeded all limits in their hostility to the Truth, at
the time when they held the reins of power. Yet in dealing with such people,
it becomes the true believers, after they have one final victory, to adopt a
general attitude of forgiveness and tolerance towards the vanquished rather
than subject them to revenge for the wrongs they committed in the past. Those
criminals whose records were exceptionally bad could, however, be punished.
The Prophet (peace be on him), availed himself of this permission in respect
of some notorious enemies whose hostility had exceeded all limits, even though
pardon and forgiveness behoved none more than him. Thus 'Uqbah ibn Abi Mu'avt
and Nadr b. Harith from among the captives of the Battle of Badr were put to
death and when a general amnesty, was proclaimed after the conquest of Makka
four out of seventeen persons were executed. (See Ibn Hisham, vol. 1, p. 644
and vol. 2, pp. 409 ff. - Ed.) These acts were based on the permission to put
to the sword those who have been conspicuously ruthless in their hostility to
Islam and the Muslims.