124. Their apology for their crimes and misdeeds would be that which has always been advanced by criminals and wrong-doers - an apology based on the assumption of absolute determinism. They would plead that when they associated others with God in His divinity, or unwarrantedly regarded certain things as prohibited, they did so because those acts had been willed for them by God. Had He not so willed, they would not have been able to do what they did. Hence, since they were doing everything according to the will of God, everything was proper. If anyone was to blame, it was God and not they. They were under compulsion to do what they did, for the ability to do otherwise lay beyond their power.
125. This provides a complete refutation of their apology. In order to appreciate
it fully, careful analysis is required. In the first place they are told that
citing God's will to justify one's errors and misdeeds, and making it a pretext
for refusing to accept true guidance was the practice of the evil-doers before
them. But they should remember that this had led to their ruin and they themselves
were witnesses to the evil consequences of deviation from the Truth.
Furthermore, it is being clarified that the plea of the unbelievers that the
only reason for their error was that God had not willed that they be guided
to the Truth, is based on fancy and conjecture rather than on sound knowledge.
They refer to God's will without understanding the relationship between God's
will and man's action. They entertain the misconception that if a man commits
theft under the will of God, that does not mean that he will not be reckoned
a criminal. For the fact is that whichever path a man chooses, be it that of
gratitude or ungratitude to God of guidance or error, obedience or disobedience,
God will open that path for him, and thereafter God will permit and enable him
within the framework of His universal scheme, and to the extent that He deems
fit - to do whatever he chooses to do whether it is right or wrong.
If their forefathers had been enabled by God's will to associate others with
Him in His divinity and prohibit clean things, that did not mean that they were
not answerable for their misdeeds. On the contrary, everyone will be held responsible
for choosing false ways, for having a false intent, and for having striven for
false ends.
The crucial point is succinctly made at the end in the words: 'Then say to-
them, (As against your argument) Allah's is the conclusive argument. Surely,
had He willed, He would have guided you all to the Truth.' The argument which
they put forward, viz. 'If Allah had willed, neither we nor our forefathers
could have associated others with Allah in His divinity', does not embody the
whole truth. The whole truth is that 'had He willed, He would have guided you
all to the Truth'. In other words, they were not prepared to take the Straight
Way of their own choice and volition. As it was not God's intent to create them
with inherent right guidance like the angels, they would be allowed to persist
in the error they had chosen for themselves.