83. The stories narrated in the Qur'an bring home unmistakenly the point
that people who reject God's Message are not spared; rather they are destroyed.
In narrating at length the story of Moses, Pharaoh and the Israelites, the Qur'an
provides some important lessons for the unbelieving Quraysh, the Jews, and also
the believers.
The Quraysh are advised that the apparently large differences in the numerical
strength of the forces of truth and falsehood in the early phase of the Islamic
movement should not lead them to entertain any, kind of illusion. History, provides
ample testimony that the Message of truth has always had a very humble beginning.
That its proponent, initially, is in the hopelessly small minority of one; in
fact, one in the whole world. He then proceeds, despite his resource lessness,
to challenge the hegemony of falsehood, to declare war against it, despite the
fact that falsehood is backed by powerful states and empires. And ultimately
the truth triumphs. The Quraysh are also reminded that all conspiracies hatched
against the Prophets and all the means employed to suppress the Message of truth
are ultimately foiled. They are further told that God grants long terms of respite
to the evil-doing nations so that they might mend their ways and reform themselves.
But when they persistently disregard all warnings and learn no lesson from instructive
events, He smites them with an exemplary punishment.
Some further lessons are meant to be conveyed to those who believed in the Prophet
(peace be on him). First, that they should not feel disheartened by the paucity
of resources, nor be overawed by the impressive numerical strength, pomp and
grandeur of their enemies. Nor should they lose heart if they find that God's
help does not come at the expected hour. Second, that those who follow in the
footsteps of the Jews are bound, ultimately, to be seized by the same curse
which afflicted the Jews.
As for the Israelites, they are warned against the evil effects of clinging
to falsehood. Illustrations of this were provided by important events in their
own history. They are also asked to purge the Message of the earlier Prophets
of all accretions and distortions and to restore it to its original purity.
84. 'They dealt with Our signs unjustly' refers to their rejection of God's signs and to the fact that they dismissed them as sheer sorcery. If a person scoffs at a beautiful couplet, and dubs it as amateurish rhyming, this amounts to committing an offence against poetry itself. Likewise, to brand those extraordinary acts of God as sorcery and magic - even though magicians declared that those acts were beyond their ability - constitutes a serious offence not only against God's signs but also against common sense and truth.
85. 'Pharaoh' literally means 'the offspring of the sun-god'. The ancient
Egyptians called the sun 'Ra', worshipped it as their supreme deity', and Pharaoh
- Ra's physical manifestation and representative - was named after it. It was
for this reason that all Egyptian rulers claimed their authority on the basis
of their association with Ra, and every ruler who mounted the Egyptian throne
called himself Pharaoh, trying thereby to assure his people that he was their
supreme deity.
It may be noted that the Qur'anic narrative regarding Moses refers to two Pharaohs.
The first of these was one during whose reign Moses was born and in whose palace
he was brought up. The second Pharaoh to Whorn reference is made is the one
whom Moses invited to Islam and who was asked to liberate the Israelites. It
is this latter Pharaoh who was finally drowned. Modern scholarship is inclined
to the view that the first Pharaoh was Rameses 11 who ruled over Egypt from
1292 B.C. to 1225 B.C. while the second Pharaoh was Minpetah, his son, who had
become a co-sharer in his father's authority during the latter's lifetime and
who, after his death, became the fully-fledged ruler of Egypt. This, however,
is not fully established since Moses, according to the Egyptian calendar, died
in 1272 B.C. In any case these are merely historical conjectures. It is quite
difficult to establish a clear chronological framework owing to discrepancies
in the Egyptian, Israeli and Christian calendars.
86. Moses was sent to Pharaoh to invite him to two things; first, to surrender himself to God (i.e. Islam); and second, to release the Israelites - who were already Muslims - from his oppressive bondage. The Qur'an refers occasionally to both these objectives, and occasionally confines itself to mentioning either of the two.
87. Moses was granted these two miraculous signs in order to provide testimony
to his being a Messenger of God, the creator and sovereign of the universe.
As we have mentioned earlier, whenever the Prophets introduced themselves as
God's Message-bearers, people asked them to produce some miraculous sign, to
perform something supernatural. In response to those demands the Prophets produced
what the Qur'an terms as 'signs', and which are called 'miracles' by theologians.
Those who tend to play down the supernatural character of such signs or miracles,
and who try to explain them in terms of natural laws of causation, in fact attempt
to build a mid-way house between believing and disbelieving in the statements
of the Qur'an. Such an approach can hardly be considered reasonable. What it
does demonstrate, however, is how such people can be pulled in two opposite
directions. On the one hand, they are not inclined to believe in a Book which
abounds in narrations of a supernatural kind. On the other hand, being born
followers of their ancestral religion, they are not inclined to reject the Book
which carries supernatural narrations.
With regard to miracles, there are two basic questions that people should ask
themselves. Did God, after creating the universe and establishing a system of
natural causations therein, suspend Himself such that it is no longer possible
for Him to interfere in the workings of the universe? Or does He still hold
the reins to His realm in His owns Hands so that His command is enforced every
moment, and He does retain the power to alter the shape of things and the normal
course of events - either partially or fully, - as and when He wills?
It is impossible for those who respond in the affirmative to the first question
to accept the idea of miracles. For clearly miracles do not fit in with their
concept of God and the universe. Honesty demands that instead of indulging in
far-fetched explanations of Qur'anic statements on miracles, such people should
clearly declare that they do not believe in the Qur'an. For quite obviously
the Qur'an is explicit, even quite emphatic in affirming the former concept
of God.
As for those who, being convinced by Qur'anic arguments, respond in the affirmative
to the second question regarding God and the universe, for them there is no
difficulty in accepting miracles. Let us take the instance mentioned in verse
107, namely, that the rod of Moses turned into a serpent. Now, there are those
who believe that serpents can come into being only through one process - the
known biological process. Such people are bound to reject the statement that
Moses' rod changed into a serpent and later reverted to its original shape.
On the contrary, if you are fully convinced that it is God's command alone which
causes life to arise from lifeless matter, and that God has full power to confer
whichever kind of life He wills, the transformation of the rod into a serpent
and its subsequent reversion to its original state is no stranger than the transformation
of any other lifeless matter into a living entity. The fact that the latter
happens virtually every day whereas the former took place only a few times in
history is not enough to declare the first as incredibly, strange and the second
as 'natural'.
88. The above account raises the question as to how a destitute member of
the slave Israeli nation could pose such a serious threat to an emperor as mighty
as Pharaoh. This is especially so when one considers that Pharaoh was not only
an absolute ruler over territory which stretched in one direction from Syria
to Libya and in the other from the Mediterranean coast to Ethiopia, but was
even considered a deity deserving of worship,
One might also wonder how the transformation of Moses' rod into a serpent could
he considered an event of such magnitude as to give rise to the fear that Moses
would overthrow the entrenched empire and unseat the royal family as well as
the entire ruling class. It might further seem strange that the mere declaration
of prophethood and the demand to liberate the people of Israel caused such a
furore even though no other political question had been touched upon.
The answer here lies in the fact that Moses' claim to prophethood implied the
call to total change, obviously, including political change. For if a person
lays claim to be God's Messenger, it implies that people obey him unreservedly.
For God's Messengers are not sent to the world to obey other human beings and
live in subordination to them; they rather ask others to accept them as their
leaders and rulers. It is this which explains why Pharaoh and his coteric felt
threatened by an all-out revolution -political, economic and social - when Moses
came forth with his call.
There remains the question as to why the claim to prophethood was considered
such a potential threat when Moses enjoyed the support of none except his brother,
Aaron, and his claim was reinforced by only two miracles - those of the shining
hand and the rod which turned into a serpent. This can be explained by two things.
First, that Pharaoh and his courtiers knew very well about Moses. All were aware
of his extraordinary abilities and his inherent calibre as a leader of men.
Also, according to the traditions of the Talmud and Josephus - provided they
are authentic -Moses had also learnt the martial arts and other skills which
were available only exclusively to royalty and which were required in connection
with their political and military leadership. Moreover, he had proved his mettle
as a good general during the expedition to Ethiopia. Furthermore, during the
course of his eight years of life in Midian - rigorous years in the desert working
as a shepherd - he had purged himself of all his weaknesses because of his association
with the Pharaonic svstern. Hence. when the Pharaonic court was confronted by
a mature, serene and pious man who came forth with the claim of prophethood,
it was obviously impossible for them to give short shrift to his claim. Second,
the miracles of the rod and the shining hand overawed Pharaoh and his courtiers
to such an extent they were almost convinced that Moses did indeed enjoy the
support of some supernatural power. That they were unnerved by the very first
proof of his prophethood is borne out by the contradictions in their charges
against Moses. On the one hand they dubbed Moses a sorcerer, and on the other
hand they accused him of plotting to banish them from their own land. It is
clear that had they taken Moses for a mere sorcerer, they would not have expressed
fears of political upheaval. For sorcery has never brought about any political
change in the world.
89. The plan of Pharaoh's courtiers clearly suggests that they knew the difference between mere sorcery and a miracle. They were well aware that miracles are effective and have the capacity to bring about actual transformation whereas sorcery results merely in optic illusion. Hence, they dubbed Moses a sorcerer so as to refute his claim to prophethood. They claimed instead that the transformation of the rod into a serpent was not a miracle; that it was rather a magical performance which could be undertaken by any sorcerer. Therefore, they asked all the sorcerers of the land to come together and display how rods could be magically transformed into serpents. They believed that such a magical show would remove the awesome effect created by Moses' miracles on the people, or at least sow doubts in their minds about those miracles.
90. It would be a mistake to believe that the rod of Moses swallowed up the rods and ropes cast by the other sorcerers and which had looked like serpents. The Qur'anic statement means that the rod of Moses swallowed up the falsehood faked by them. This clearly shows that wherever Moses' rod moved, it destroyed the magical effect which had caused the transformation of their ropes and rods. One blow of Moses' rod caused every other rod to revert to a rod, and every rope to revert to a rope. (For further elaboration see Tafhim al-Qur'an, (Ta Ha 20, n. 42)
91. Thus God turned the tables on Pharaoh and his courtiers they arranged the magic show in the hope that it would convince the people that Moses was just a sorcerer, and thus make them sceptical about his claim to prophethood. But the actual outcome was quite the opposite. The sorcerers who had been assembled were defeated. Not only that, it was also unanimously acknowledged that the signs displayed by Moses in support of his claim were not feats of magic. Rather, his signs rather manifested the might of God, the Lord of the universe, and hence could not be overcome by magic.
92. Faced with utter failure Pharaoh finally resorted to branding the whole
magic tournament as a conspiracy concocted by Moses and his accomplice sorcerers.
Under threat of death and physical torture he asked the sorcerers to confess
that they had acted in collusion with Moses. This last move by Pharaoh was ineffectual.
For the sorcerers readily agreed to endure every torture, clearly proving thereby
that their decision to accept Moses' message reflected their sincere conviction
and that no conspiracy was involved. Pharaoh was hardly left with any choice.
He, therefore, gave up all pretence to follow truth and justice, and brazenly
resorted to persecution instead.
The tremendous and instantaneous change which took place in the characters of
the sorcerers is also of significance. The sorcerers had come all the way from
their homes with the purpose of vindicating their ancestral faith and receiving
pecuniary reward from Pharaoh for overcoming Moses. However, the moment true
faith illumined their hearts, they displayed such resoluteness of will and love
for the truth that they contemptuously turned down Pharaoh's offer, and demonstrated
their full readiness to endure even the worst punishments for the sake of the
truth that had dawned upon them.
93. There were two periods of persecution. The first was during the reign of Rameses 11 and took place before Moses' birth, whereas the second period of persecution started after Moses' assumption to the office of prophethood. Common to both periods is the killing of the male issue of Israelites while the female was spared. It was a calculated design to rob the Israelites of their identity and to bring about their forcible assimilation. An inscription discovered during the archaeological excavations of 1896 probably belongs to this period. According to this inscription, Pharaoh Minpetah rounds off the narration of his achievements and victories in these words: 'The Israel have been exterminated, and no seed of them is left.' For further explanation see (al-Mu'min 40: 25)
94. Pharaoh's courtiers obstinately persisted in branding Moses' signs as
sorcery although they knew well that sorcery had nothing in common with the
miraculous signs granted to Moses. Even a fool would not he ready to believe
that the country-wide famine and the consistent decrease in agricultural output
could have been caused by magic. It is for this reason that the Qur'an says:
But when Our signs, which should have opened their eyes, came to them they said:
'This is clear sorcery! And they rejected those signs out of iniquity and arrogance
even though they were inwardly convinced of it'
(al-Naml 27: 13-14).
95. This probably refers to the torrential rain accompanied by hailstorm. While we do not totally exclude the possibility of other kinds of storms, we are inclined to the view, that it probably signifies hailstorm since the Bible specifically mentions that. (See Exodus 9: 23-4 - Ed.)
96. The word used in the text - qummal - denotes lice, fleas, small locusts, mosquitoes, and weevil. This rather general term has been used in the Qur'an probably to suggest that while men were afflicted with lice and fleas, weevil destroyed the barns. (Cf. Exodus 7-12. See also Tafhim al-ur'an, (al-Zukhruf 43, n. 43.)
97. The Israelites were made the inheritors of Palestine. This has been interpreted by some commentators of the Qur'an to mean that the Israelites were made the rulers of Egypt as well. This view, however, is neither supported by, the Qur'an nor by any other historical and archaeological evidence. We have, therefore, serious reservations about the correctness of this opinion. (See Tafhim a]-Qur'an, (al-Kahf 18, n. 57), and (al-Shuara' 26, n. 45)